Verapamil

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 6

Table of Contents

  1. Verapamil
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Verapamil: Obsolete bundle branch block
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Verapamil: Obsolete bundle branch block

One-Sentence Summary

Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker, originally used for hypertension, atrial fibrillation, acute coronary syndrome, Prinzmetal angina and ventricular tachycardia. The TxGNN model’s top-ranked prediction is obsolete bundle branch block, but there are 0 clinical trials and 0 publications supporting it. The prediction rests on the model alone and is probably a TxGNN model (deep learning) artifact.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Obsolete bundle branch block
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9962
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (17 of 17) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products 17 (valid: 17)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism-of-action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Verapamil is a well-known L-type calcium channel blocker. It slows conduction through the atrioventricular (AV) node and relaxes vascular smooth muscle, which explains its use in hypertension, angina and supraventricular arrhythmias.

For the top prediction (obsolete bundle branch block, 0.9962), this mechanism does not offer a therapeutic rationale. Slowing AV conduction is not a treatment for bundle branch block and may worsen conduction disease. The disease term is also marked as obsolete. The score comes from the TxGNN model (deep learning) and may reflect similarities the model learned between related diseases, not biological evidence.

Other predictions are somewhat more plausible mechanistically but equally unsupported by direct evidence:

Rank Predicted Indication Score Evidence Level Comment
3 Malignant hypertensive renal disease 0.9927 L5 Plausible blood pressure effect; no specific data
4 Pulmonary hypertension owing to lung disease and/or hypoxia 0.9926 L5 Only indirect preclinical data; calcium channel blockers may impair hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and gas exchange
5 Pulmonary hypertension with unclear multifactorial mechanism 0.9926 L5 Calcium channel blockers are used only in the small vasoreactive subset, and verapamil is generally avoided because of negative inotropy
6 Braddock syndrome 0.9915 L5 No identifiable mechanistic rationale
7 Periodic paralysis with transient compartment-like syndrome 0.9908 L5 Speculative channelopathy link only

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

For the top-ranked prediction (obsolete bundle branch block), currently no related literature is available.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
22147655 2012 Review Hormone and Metabolic Research Factors affecting the aldosterone/renin ratio; malignant or renovascular hypertension and some antihypertensives can cause false-negative screening for primary aldosteronism
10224210 1999 Case report Pediatrics Solitary renal myofibromatosis described as a previously unreported cause of renovascular hypertension in infants

For the fourth-ranked prediction (pulmonary hypertension due to lung disease/hypoxia), the retrieved papers are mostly preclinical or off-topic. The most relevant are:

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
9440591 1998 Review Chest Multifocal atrial tachycardia in patients with severe illness, mostly COPD; tangential to the predicted indication
1353873 1992 Review Pathologie-biologie Calcium channel blockers (including verapamil) for migraine prevention; efficacy not firmly demonstrated; off-topic
24977753 2014 Preclinical J Trauma Acute Care Surg Verapamil helped preserve cytoskeletal function in an in vitro intestinal model of hypoxia-reoxygenation
21962069 2011 Preclinical High Alt Med Biol Long-term hypoxia and L-type calcium channels in sheep pulmonary artery contractility
9768801 1998 Preclinical Anesth Analg Ketamine-induced pulmonary vasodilation in isolated rat lung is partly mediated by L-type calcium channels (verapamil used as a tool)
2429105 1986 Review J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Physiological mechanisms of ventricular hypertrophy

India Market Information

Verapamil has 17 valid single-ingredient registrations and no cancelled ones. Approved-indication text is not recorded for any of them. The five main entries are:

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
34075 Calaptin 40 Tablet (Abbott) Strip of 30 tablets Not stated
233892 Vpl 5mg Injection (Samarth Life Sciences) Vial of 2 ml injection Not stated
237647 Verap 40mg Tablet (Mano Pharma) Strip of 10 tablets Not stated
37262 Calaptin 240 SR Tablet (Abbott) Strip of 15 sustained-release tablets Not stated
239131 Vasopten 120mg Tablet (Torrent) Strip of 10 tablets Not stated

Both oral and injectable forms are marketed.

Safety Considerations

Contraindications flagged by the knowledge graph (drug-disease links, not label text):

  • Cardiac: heart failure, atrioventricular block, aortic stenosis and other aortic valve disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypotensive disorder, ventricular tachycardia (including catecholaminergic and infantile forms)
  • Neuromuscular: myasthenia gravis and other neuromuscular junction disease
  • Hepatic, renal and other: liver disease, kidney disease, renal artery obstruction, gallbladder disease, pyoureter
  • Haematological: neutropenia, agranulocytosis
  • Immune and tissue: angioedema (several forms, including hereditary), connective tissue, bone and cartilage disease

Atrioventricular block and heart failure are especially relevant to the top prediction, because verapamil could worsen conduction disease.

Drug Interactions: 328 interactions were identified. Examples from the retrieved list:

  • Major: Loperamide
  • Moderate: Clarithromycin, Cimetidine, Bupropion, Aprepitant, Metformin, Canagliflozin, Acetylsalicylic acid, several corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, budesonide, triamcinolone), and several calcium salts
  • Minor: Morphine

Package insert warnings and contraindications could not be retrieved. Please refer to the package insert for label safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: All seven predictions are supported by model scores only, with no clinical trials and no direct literature. The top prediction (obsolete bundle branch block) is mechanistically implausible and carries a safety concern. Verapamil is also contraindicated in atrioventricular block and heart failure. The pulmonary hypertension predictions carry safety concerns of their own.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the Indian regulator (a blocking gap for safety screening)
  • Mechanism-of-action data from DrugBank
  • Review of the hypertension-related predictions (ranks 2 and 3) against existing hypertension use. They overlap with the approved indication and may add little new value.
  • Targeted literature and trial searches for any prediction that moves forward
  • A safety assessment for conduction disease and pulmonary hypertension before further consideration

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.