Travoprost
| Evidence Level: L5 | Predicted Indications: 10 |
Table of Contents
Travoprost: From Open-Angle Glaucoma to Visceral Calciphylaxis
One-Sentence Summary
Travoprost is a prostaglandin F2-alpha analogue originally used to lower eye pressure in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for visceral calciphylaxis, but this is a model prediction only: no clinical trials and no publications support it. Evidence for the other top-ranked predictions is also absent or only indirect.
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension |
| Predicted New Indication | Visceral calciphylaxis |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 1.0000 |
| Evidence Level | L5 |
| India Market Status | Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data |
| Number of Listed Products | at least 20 |
| Recommended Decision | Hold |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, travoprost is a prostaglandin F2-alpha (FP receptor) agonist. In glaucoma it lowers eye pressure, and its efficacy there is well established.
The link to visceral calciphylaxis (calcific uremic arteriolopathy) is weak. FP-receptor agonists have vasodilatory activity, which is conceptually related to vascular disease. However, the data compiled for this report show no biological or clinical link to calciphylaxis. Topical eye-drop dosing also gives minimal systemic exposure, so a systemic vascular effect is unlikely.
The other top predictions (thoracic outlet syndromes, angiodysplasia of the stomach, blue toe syndrome, lymphangiectasis, spontaneous coronary artery dissection) show the same pattern. Several are mainly mechanical or anatomical conditions with no plausible role for an FP-receptor agonist. The high scores come from the TxGNN model (deep learning) and may reflect similarities the model learned between related diseases, not biological evidence.
Clinical Trial Evidence
No clinical trials are registered for visceral calciphylaxis, the top prediction. The only trials retrieved relate to the fifth-ranked prediction, “vascular disease”. They are shown below for context.
| Trial Number | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00308945 | Phase 4 | Completed | 20 | Travoprost vs latanoprost effects on retinal vessel diameter and choroidal blood flow in glaucoma; the most relevant hemodynamic study, but not a vascular disease treatment trial |
| NCT02136589 | Phase 4 | Completed | 40 | NSAID pretreatment and travoprost-induced conjunctival hyperemia; an adverse-effect study |
| NCT00293800 | Phase 3 | Completed | 173 | Glaucoma therapy in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (original indication) |
| NCT00293761 | Phase 3 | Completed | 109 | Glaucoma therapy in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (original indication) |
| NCT00293787 | Phase 3 | Completed | 156 | Glaucoma therapy in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (original indication) |
| NCT00672997 | Phase 3 | Completed | 301 | Travoprost/timolol BAC-free combination vs standard combination in glaucoma |
| NCT00760539 | Phase 3 | Completed | 87 | Travoprost/timolol BAC-free combination vs standard combination in glaucoma (Japan) |
| NCT02140060 | Phase 2 | Completed | 327 | Travoprost/brinzolamide fixed combination, IOP-lowering in glaucoma |
| NCT01510145 | Phase 4 | Completed | 191 | BAK-free travoprost after switching from latanoprost in glaucoma |
| NCT00047554 | N/A | Terminated | 336 | Five-year safety study of iris pigmentation changes with Travatan |
These trials mostly concern the original indication, so they should not be counted as evidence for any new indication.
Literature Evidence
No publications were found for visceral calciphylaxis. The literature below was retrieved for the “vascular disease” and “hemangioendothelioma” predictions and is mostly about glaucoma and ocular side effects.
| PMID | Year | Type | Journal | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22167538 | 2012 | Meta-analysis | Eur J Ophthalmol | IOP-lowering and tolerability of three prostaglandin-timolol fixed combinations |
| 23231442 | 2013 | Meta-analysis | J Ocul Pharmacol Ther | Prostaglandin analogs with timolol, fixed vs unfixed combinations, in open-angle glaucoma |
| 31335731 | 2019 | Review | Medicine | Protocol for evaluating travoprost efficacy in glaucoma |
| 25867658 | 2015 | Systematic Review | Curr Med Res Opin | Updated review of prostaglandin-timolol fixed combinations |
| 19019922 | 2009 | Systematic Review | Br J Ophthalmol | Conjunctival hyperaemia with latanoprost vs travoprost and bimatoprost |
| 12648301 | 2003 | Review | J Ocul Pharmacol Ther | Hyperemia occurs in up to 50% of patients on travoprost |
| 18497524 | 2008 | Clinical Study | Ophthalmologica | Ocular surface side effects of travoprost vs bimatoprost over 6 months |
| 26847553 | 2016 | Observational | Jpn J Ophthalmol | Quantified conjunctival injection with glaucoma eye drops |
| 19107053 | 2008 | Case Report | J Fr Ophtalmol | Uveal effusion induced by topical travoprost in a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome; a safety signal, not evidence of benefit |
| 40718639 | 2025 | Review | Int J Nanomedicine | Nanomedicine-based ophthalmic drug delivery |
India Market Information
Travoprost has 20 valid single-ingredient registrations in India and none cancelled. Approved indication text is not listed in the registration data. Five main registrations are shown below.
| Authorization Number | Product Name | Dosage Form | Approved Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| 227935 | Travina 0.004% Eye Drop | Bottle of 3 ml eye drop | Not listed |
| 225842 | Tvpress Eye Drop | Packet of 3 ml eye drop | Not listed |
| 220803 | Travosoft Eye Drop BAK Free | Bottle of 3 ml eye drop | Not listed |
| 217594 | T Prost Eye Drop | Bottle of 3 ml ophthalmic solution | Not listed |
| 215252 | Tovaxo Eye Drop BAK Free | Bottle of 2.5 ml eye drop | Not listed |
All products are ophthalmic formulations. No systemic dosage form is registered, which is a barrier for any systemic indication.
Safety Considerations
- Disease associations in the knowledge graph (not label text): the TxGNN knowledge graph links travoprost with contraindications in uveitis, iris disease, ciliary body disease, panuveitis, iritis, cystoid macular edema and macular retinal edema.
- Drug Interactions: 49 potential interactions were identified, all with unclassified severity. Examples include calcitriol, prednisone, prednisolone, triamcinolone, metformin, omeprazole, simvastatin and acetylsalicylic acid. Their clinical significance is unknown.
- Case report signal: topical travoprost induced uveal effusion with exudative retinal detachment in a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome, a vascular malformation disorder. Caution is warranted in patients with vascular anomalies.
- Common ocular effects: conjunctival hyperemia (up to about 50% of patients in one review) and iris pigmentation changes.
Please refer to the package insert for further safety information.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold
Rationale: The top prediction, visceral calciphylaxis, rests on model score alone (Evidence Level L5), with no trials, no literature and no plausible mechanistic link. The only retrieved studies concern glaucoma or ocular side effects and cannot be counted as support for a new indication. Topical ocular dosing also gives minimal systemic exposure.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- Mechanism of action data and a biological rationale linking FP-receptor agonism to calciphylaxis or the other predicted conditions
- Preclinical studies (for example, vascular calcification models) that test the hypothesis
- A suitable systemic route or formulation, since only ophthalmic products are registered
- Package insert warnings and contraindications from the India product labels
- A review of the unclassified drug interactions, particularly in dialysis patients, who are the typical calciphylaxis population
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.