Sulpiride

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 9

Table of Contents

  1. Sulpiride
  2. Sulpiride: From Schizophrenia/Depression to Retinal Dystrophy with or without Extraocular Anomalies
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. India Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Using the drug-repurposing-report template directly (no coding/debugging skill applies here — this is a pure content-generation task against a fully specified format).


Sulpiride: From Schizophrenia/Depression to Retinal Dystrophy with or without Extraocular Anomalies

One-Sentence Summary

Sulpiride is a D₂/D₃ dopamine receptor antagonist historically used for schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety (never FDA/EMA-approved; not currently marketed in India). The TxGNN model’s top prediction is Retinal Dystrophy with or without Extraocular Anomalies, a rare congenital eye disorder, but this is supported by 0 clinical trials and no literature that actually links Sulpiride to the disease — the strongest available “evidence” is a high model confidence score alone.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not on file in India regulatory data; per DrugBank pharmacology profile, used for schizophrenia, depression, anxiety (adults) and behavioural problems (children) — no FDA/EMA approval on record
Predicted New Indication Retinal dystrophy with or without extraocular anomalies
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.95%
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Not Marketed
Number of Registrations 0
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available (Data Gap DG002). Based on known pharmacology data, Sulpiride acts as a selective antagonist at D₂ and D₃ dopamine receptors, with weak off-target affinity for three carbonic anhydrase isoforms (CA1, CA7, CA12). It has historically been used for schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety in adults, and behavioural problems in children, though it has never received FDA or EMA marketing authorization.

Retinal dystrophy with or without extraocular anomalies — the top-ranked predicted indication — is a genetically driven congenital eye disorder, typically caused by mutations in retinal developmental genes. There is no established pharmacological pathway connecting dopamine receptor antagonism or weak carbonic anhydrase inhibition to correction of a congenital structural retinal defect.

Based on the evidence review, this prediction is very likely a knowledge-graph artifact rather than a genuine repurposing signal: none of the 15 retrieved publications mention Sulpiride — all simply describe clinical features of congenital ocular/orbital disorders with no therapeutic context. The same pattern — a high TxGNN confidence score paired with zero clinical trials, no supporting literature, and a congenital/monogenic disease mechanism unlikely to respond to pharmacotherapy — repeats across all nine top-ranked predicted indications for this drug (ranks 2–9), which include hydranencephaly, X-linked myopia, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1G, and several other rare structural or single-gene developmental disorders. This consistent pattern across the whole ranked list further supports a sparse-node/model-artifact explanation rather than a true biological signal.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
9416661 1997 Review Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MR Overview of orbital infections; no mention of Sulpiride or pharmacotherapy
20127583 2010 Review Seminars in Neurology Clinical approach to diplopia; unrelated to Sulpiride
22241537 2012 Review Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde Congenital ptosis pathophysiology; no drug therapy discussed
38249493 2023 Review Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology Congenital lens shape anomalies; developmental biology only
7035111 1981 Review Documenta Ophthalmologica Wagner-Stickler syndrome vitreoretinal degeneration; genetic/structural, no pharmacotherapy
38321238 2024 Review Pediatric Radiology Imaging classification of pediatric orbital/ocular lesions; no treatment data
19064847 2008 Review Archives of Ophthalmology Orbital arteriovenous malformations management; unrelated mechanism
109006 1979 Case Report American Journal of Ophthalmology Unilateral cryptophthalmia case description; no drug relevance
24413161 2014 Case Report Journal of Neuro-Ophthalmology Congenital trochlear-oculomotor synkinesis case; no pharmacotherapy
19826317 2009 Case Report Optometry and Vision Science Congenital extraocular muscle fibrosis case; no drug relevance

Note: All 15 retrieved publications discuss the clinical features of congenital eye/orbital disorders. None address Sulpiride, dopaminergic mechanisms, or any pharmacological intervention.


India Market Information

Sulpiride is not currently marketed or registered in India — 0 authorizations on file.


Safety Considerations

  • Pharmacological Targets (per DrugBank pharmacology data): Sulpiride is a selective antagonist at D₂ and D₃ dopamine receptors (target genes: DRD2, DRD3), with additional weak, likely clinically insignificant affinity for carbonic anhydrase isoforms CA1, CA7, and CA12.
  • Key warnings and contraindications for this drug are not yet available (Data Gap DG001, flagged Blocking) — this must be resolved from the official India/TFDA package insert before any S1 safety evaluation can proceed.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Every one of the nine top-ranked TxGNN predictions for Sulpiride is scored “Hold” — high model confidence is not matched by any clinical trial or Sulpiride-specific literature, and the predicted diseases are predominantly monogenic/congenital structural disorders with no plausible pharmacological reversibility. Separately, the missing package-insert warnings/contraindications (DG001, Blocking) independently prevent this candidate from entering a formal S1 safety evaluation regardless of prediction strength.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Retrieve TFDA/India label warnings and contraindications (DG001 — blocking; required before any S1 review)
  • Confirm mechanism of action from DrugBank/primary literature (DG002)
  • Independently assess whether the TxGNN model’s high scores for this drug reflect a genuine biological signal or a knowledge-graph sparsity artifact, given the consistent absence of trials/literature across the full ranked list
  • If any indication is to be pursued further, prioritize one with an actual mechanistic or epidemiological rationale rather than the current top-ranked congenital/genetic disease candidates

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.