Ranitidine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 6

Table of Contents

  1. Ranitidine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Ranitidine: Peptic ulcer perforation
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ranitidine: Peptic ulcer perforation

One-Sentence Summary

Ranitidine is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist that reduces gastric acid secretion and is marketed in India as a single-ingredient product. The TxGNN model predicts it may be useful for peptic ulcer perforation, but no clinical trial is registered and none of the supplied publications tests ranitidine as a treatment for this condition, so the evidence level is L5 (model prediction only).

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Peptic ulcer perforation
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9988
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products at least 20
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Ranitidine belongs to the H2-receptor antagonist class, whose general effect is to lower gastric acid output. Acid suppression is established as helpful for ulcer healing and for preventing ulcer recurrence. Long-term H2-antagonist therapy has been reviewed as reducing relapse and, in one review, the risk of complications (PMIDs 8364140 and 8103373).

The link to perforation is weak, however. Perforation is an acute surgical complication, and acid suppression does not treat it. At most, ranitidine could play an adjunct or secondary-prevention role, for example in protecting high-risk patients or supporting healing after repair. The supplied studies do not show such a benefit directly. The one randomized trial on perforated ulcer (PMID 2927479) compared nonoperative management with emergency surgery and did not test ranitidine specifically. The prediction therefore rests mainly on the model score and a plausible but indirect mechanistic argument.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
2927479 1989 RCT N Engl J Med 83 patients with suspected perforated peptic ulcer were randomized to nonoperative treatment or emergency surgery. Not ranitidine-specific.
7861219 1995 RCT J Neurosurg 101 high-risk neurosurgical patients received ranitidine 50 mg every 6 hours or placebo to prevent postoperative gastroduodenal bleeding and/or perforation. This tested prevention in a different setting, not treatment of perforated ulcer.
11488789 2001 Retrospective and randomized studies Br J Surg Examined the effect of H. pylori eradication on ulcer recurrence after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer. Not ranitidine-specific.
8364140 1993 Review of controlled trials Aliment Pharmacol Ther Continuous H2-antagonist therapy reduces ulcer recurrence. Relapse rates vary with study design.
8103373 1993 Review Aliment Pharmacol Ther Long-term H2-antagonist treatment aims to prevent painful recurrence and to reduce the risk of complications such as haemorrhage and perforation.
8346951 1993 Clinical study Arch Dis Child Intravenous ranitidine at different doses was assessed for its effect on intragastric pH in 10 preterm infants on dexamethasone, who are at risk of gastric perforation.
11871831 2002 Clinical study Indian J Gastroenterol Studied H. pylori infection in patients operated on for perforated duodenal ulcer and its effect on ulcer healing.
1679675 1991 Review Aliment Pharmacol Ther Therapeutic recommendations for NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury, a cause of bleeding and perforation.
9260785 1997 Review Am J Gastroenterol H. pylori and NSAIDs cause almost all gastric and duodenal ulcers. Therapy is moving from acid suppression alone toward addressing causes.
8781800 1996 Case report Endoscopy A very rare case of a gastric ulcer penetrating the pericardium and heart.

India Market Information

Ranitidine is currently marketed in India. The data compiled for this report show 20 valid single-ingredient licences and no cancelled ones. The records may be partial. The table lists five main authorizations; approved indication text is not recorded in the local data.

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
185026 Rantid 150mg Tablet (Gracure Pharmaceuticals) Strip of 10 tablets Not listed
185430 R-Loc 50mg Injection 2ml (Zydus Cadila) Packet of 14 injections Not listed
193730 Reltac 300mg Tablet (Relish Pharmaceuticals) Strip of 10 tablets Not listed
18467 Ancid 150mg Syrup (Angeas Healthcare) Bottle of 170 ml syrup Not listed
184342 Rantidine 150mg Tablet (Cipla) Strip of 10 tablets Not listed

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: The interaction query found 585 recorded interactions. Examples in the supplied list include:
    • Major: atazanavir.
    • Moderate: acalabrutinib, acetohexamide, aminophylline, bosutinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, chlorpropamide, and several cephalosporins (cefditoren, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime).
    • Minor: acetaminophen, alendronic acid, aluminum hydroxide, calcium carbonate, cisapride.

For warnings and contraindications, please refer to the package insert.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale:

  • The evidence level is L5. No registered trial and no supplied study tests ranitidine as a treatment for peptic ulcer perforation. The randomized trial of ranitidine (PMID 7861219) looked at prevention of postoperative gastroduodenal bleeding in neurosurgical patients. Perforation is an acute surgical event that acid suppression does not treat, so the mechanistic link is indirect.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Mechanism of action data for ranitidine.
  • Clinical studies that define a specific role, such as adjunct therapy after perforation repair or prevention in high-risk patients, and test ranitidine directly in that role.
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications for safety screening.
  • Review of the interaction profile, especially the major interaction with atazanavir, if a study is planned.

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.