Nitrendipine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 3

Table of Contents

  1. Nitrendipine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Nitrendipine: From Hypertension to Migraine Disorder
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Nitrendipine: From Hypertension to Migraine Disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Nitrendipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker used for mild to moderate hypertension. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for migraine disorder, but there are no clinical trials and no relevant publications supporting this prediction. Of the four predicted indications, pulmonary hypertension and Prinzmetal angina have more supporting data, and they are discussed below for comparison.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Mild to moderate hypertension (from pharmacology reference data; the approved indication text on the India licences is blank)
Predicted New Indication Migraine disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9942
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (2 of 2) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products 2 (valid: 2)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Nitrendipine is known as a dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker. It also shows activity at several Cav1.x channels and at KCa3.1 in pharmacology records. Its efficacy in hypertension is established, and mechanistically it could be applicable to migraine.

Other calcium channel blockers, such as flunarizine and verapamil, are used for migraine prophylaxis. This gives a class-level rationale, based on modulation of cerebrovascular tone and neuronal calcium influx. However, there is no nitrendipine-specific data in migraine. The retrieved literature does not support the prediction. It covers grapefruit juice interactions, a general review of dihydropyridines, and a case of abdominal migraine, and none evaluates nitrendipine in migraine. The high TxGNN score is a computational prediction only.

The second prediction, migraine with brainstem aura, rests on the same calcium channel hypothesis. Some familial hemiplegic migraine subtypes involve CACNA1A channelopathy, but there are no trials or literature for nitrendipine in this rare subtype.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials are registered for migraine disorder.

For reference, the only registered trial listed for any predicted indication is under pulmonary hypertension, and it is not relevant:

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT04330300 Phase 4 Suspended 2414 COVID-19 trial of ACE inhibitors/ARBs. It does not test nitrendipine in pulmonary hypertension, so it provides no direct evidence.

Literature Evidence

Migraine disorder (none of the three papers evaluates nitrendipine in migraine):

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
15449971 2004 Review Am J Cardiovasc Drugs Grapefruit juice interactions with cardiovascular drugs; not about migraine
3319491 1987 Review Drugs Second-generation dihydropyridines, including nitrendipine; general pharmacology and indications
9760558 1998 Case report Neurol Neurochir Pol Adult abdominal migraine; not related to nitrendipine

Comparison with other predicted indications:

Pulmonary hypertension (score 0.9914, Evidence Level L3)

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
2013178 1991 Clinical hemodynamic study Clin Cardiol Acute sublingual nitrendipine lowered mean pulmonary artery pressure in 11 patients with pulmonary fibrosis; chronic effects also examined
2468866 1988 Clinical hemodynamic study J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 5 mg sublingual nitrendipine lowered blood pressure and right heart pressures in 10 patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension
2468868 1988 Clinical hemodynamic study J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Acute and chronic hemodynamic and antianginal effects in 25 patients with angina and hypertension
2937355 1986 Preclinical (animal) Am Rev Respir Dis Nitrendipine reduced pulmonary vascular remodeling and right ventricular hypertrophy in rats exposed to intermittent hypoxia
1339619 1992 Comparative study Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi Captopril and nitrendipine both lowered pulmonary artery pressure in pigs with acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension
7712585 1994 Animal study Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi Nitrendipine, nifedipine and L-arginine helped prevent chronic intermittent hypoxic pulmonary hypertension in rats
PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
1920816 1991 Clinical study (single-blind, 21 patients) Jpn Heart J Anginal attacks fell significantly from 2.1 to 0.7 per day on nitrendipine 10 to 20 mg daily
14689111 2003 Review Herz Differential use of calcium antagonists

India Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
Registration No. 53595 Cardif 10mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated in the licence record
Registration No. 45718 Cardif 20mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated in the licence record

Both are valid single-ingredient oral products from Concept Pharmaceuticals Ltd.


Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Pharmacology records show nitrendipine binding to calcium channel targets (Cav1.1 to Cav1.4) and KCa3.1. These are target interactions, not drug-drug interactions, and no clinically graded interactions were identified. Grapefruit juice may increase oral bioavailability of dihydropyridines through CYP3A4 inhibition (PMID 15449971). This is a general class caution, not specific to this label.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The migraine prediction has a high model score, but there are no clinical trials, no nitrendipine-specific literature, and no mechanism data. This leaves it at L5, prediction only. The pulmonary hypertension and Prinzmetal angina predictions have more support (L3) and can be treated as research questions. For pulmonary hypertension, the evidence is small and old, and calcium channel blockers are used today only in vasoreactive responders. For Prinzmetal angina, it is a plausible on-class extension, but nitrendipine has no clear advantage over approved agents such as amlodipine, diltiazem or nifedipine.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications for the marketed Cardif products
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • For migraine, nitrendipine-specific preclinical or clinical evidence, or a head-to-head rationale against established calcium channel blockers such as flunarizine
  • For pulmonary hypertension or Prinzmetal angina, a controlled study or systematic review, plus a comparison with current standard therapy

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.