Lurasidone
| Evidence Level: L5 | Predicted Indications: 9 |
Table of Contents
- Lurasidone
- Pharmacist Assessment Report
- Lurasidone: Retinal dystrophy with or without extraocular anomalies
- One-Sentence Summary
- Quick Overview
- Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
- Clinical Trial Evidence
- Literature Evidence
- India Market Information
- Safety Considerations
- Conclusion and Next Steps
- Review Log
- Disclaimer
Lurasidone: Retinal dystrophy with or without extraocular anomalies
One-Sentence Summary
Lurasidone is an atypical antipsychotic originally used to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. This is not a truly novel indication, because lurasidone is already used in bipolar disorder (mainly bipolar depression).
Quick Overview
| Item | Content |
|---|---|
| Original Indication | Not recorded in the local data |
| Predicted New Indication | Retinal dystrophy with or without extraocular anomalies |
| TxGNN Prediction Score | 0.9995 |
| Evidence Level | L5 |
| India Market Status | Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data |
| Number of Listed Products | at least 20 |
| Recommended Decision | Hold (treat as a research question) |
Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on general knowledge of the drug class, lurasidone is an atypical antipsychotic. Its blocking of dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2A receptors, together with activity at 5-HT7 and 5-HT1A receptors, plausibly supports an antimanic effect.
Lurasidone is already used in bipolar disorder, and mania is one phase of that condition. The prediction is therefore close to the drug’s existing use rather than a leap into a new disease area.
The evidence for acute mania is weaker than for bipolar depression. Most of the literature found concerns bipolar depression, and the only trial directly testing mania was withdrawn. The mechanistic link rests on general class pharmacology, not on a documented mechanism record.
Clinical Trial Evidence
| Trial Number | Phase | Status | Enrollment | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCT01932541 | Phase 4 | Withdrawn | 0 | 8-week open-label study of lurasidone (Latuda) for mania in children and adolescents aged 6-17 with bipolar I, II and spectrum disorders. No participants were enrolled, so there are no efficacy or safety data. |
Literature Evidence
| PMID | Year | Type | Journal | Key Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39557452 | 2024 | Meta-analysis | BMJ Ment Health | Dose-response meta-analysis of lurasidone for bipolar depression, covering efficacy, acceptability and metabolic/endocrine profile |
| 37595997 | 2023 | Network meta-analysis | Lancet Psychiatry | Comparative efficacy and tolerability of drugs for acute bipolar depression in adults |
| 38487836 | 2024 | Network meta-analysis | Eur Psychiatry | Efficacy and tolerability of FDA-approved atypical antipsychotics, including lurasidone, in bipolar depression (16 RCTs, 7,234 patients) |
| 33177610 | 2021 | Network meta-analysis | Mol Psychiatry | Mood stabilizers and/or antipsychotics in the maintenance phase of bipolar disorder |
| 29536616 | 2018 | Guideline/Review | Bipolar Disord | CANMAT/ISBD 2018 guidelines for managing bipolar disorder |
| 34599629 | 2021 | Guideline/Review | Bipolar Disord | CANMAT/ISBD recommendations for bipolar disorder with mixed presentations |
| 37815563 | 2023 | Review | JAMA | Review of diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder |
| 36472471 | 2022 | Review | J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol | Treatment algorithms for manic/mixed and depressed episodes in pediatric bipolar disorder |
| 39243127 | 2024 | Review | Med Sci Monit | Narrative review of newer antipsychotics and mood stabilizers, including lurasidone, in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia |
| 24170243 | 2014 | Commentary | Am J Psychiatry | Commentary on lurasidone and bipolar disorder |
India Market Information
Lurasidone has 20 valid single-ingredient registrations, with no cancelled licences. All are oral tablets (strip of 10 tablets). The registration records carry no approved-indication text. The five listed below are examples.
| Authorization Number | Product Name | Dosage Form | Approved Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| 131548 | Luratrend 80mg Tablet (Abbott) | Tablet, strip of 10 | Not stated in the registration record |
| 124437 | Lurafic 80mg Tablet (Lupin) | Tablet, strip of 10 | Not stated in the registration record |
| 128942 | Lurakem 80mg Tablet (Alkem) | Tablet, strip of 10 | Not stated in the registration record |
| 217059 | Tablura 40 Tablet (Cipla) | Tablet, strip of 10 | Not stated in the registration record |
| 121556 | Lurasid 40 Tablet (Intas) | Tablet, strip of 10 | Not stated in the registration record |
Safety Considerations
The package insert warnings and contraindications could not be retrieved, so please refer to the package insert for label safety information.
- Disease-level contraindication signals (from the knowledge graph, not label text): The graph links lurasidone to a broad set of conditions of concern, including:
- Cardiovascular and neurological: orthostatic hypotension, stroke and cerebrovascular disorders, transient ischemic attack, epilepsy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive dyskinesia
- Metabolic and endocrine: hyperglycemia, diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperlipidemia, hyperprolactinemia
- Haematological, hepatic and renal: neutropenia, leukopenia, agranulocytosis, liver disease or failure, impaired renal function
- Drug interactions: 179 interactions were recorded. Examples classed as Major are bupropion, aprepitant, morphine and clarithromycin. Moderate examples include several antidiabetic agents (acarbose, metformin, pioglitazone, alogliptin, canagliflozin, chlorpropamide, albiglutide), anticholinergics (atropine, hyoscyamine, glycopyrronium), epinephrine, dexamethasone, cimetidine and lorcaserin. Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers deserve particular attention when assessing this class of interaction.
- Metabolic monitoring: Weight gain and glucose dysregulation with antipsychotics are discussed in the supporting literature, so metabolic monitoring is advisable.
Conclusion and Next Steps
Decision: Hold (treat as a research question)
Rationale: The TxGNN score is very high, but lurasidone is already used in bipolar disorder, so this prediction adds little that is new. Package-insert safety data are also missing.
Review correction (2026-10-31): Originally stated: “The TxGNN score is very high, but lurasidone is already used in bipolar disorder, so this prediction adds little that is new. Direct evidence for acute mania is thin: the only mania trial was withdrawn with no enrolment, and the supporting literature is mostly reviews, guidelines and meta-analyses on bipolar depression.” Removed: it said the product records were cancelled, discontinued, or not current, which did not match the Indian medicine data (the Indian Medicine Dataset as of 2026-10-31). Source: Indian Medicine Dataset.
To proceed, the following is needed:
- Package-insert warnings and contraindications from the Indian regulatory sources, to enable safety screening
- Mechanism of action data (for example from DrugBank)
- Randomized controlled trial evidence specific to acute manic or mixed episodes (adult and paediatric)
- Review of the approved indication wording on the Indian labels, to confirm whether acute mania falls inside or outside the current labelling
- A metabolic, cardiovascular and drug-interaction monitoring plan
Note on other TxGNN predictions: The nine other predictions in the ranked list (for example retinal dystrophy, hydranencephaly, X-linked myopia, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1G) have no clinical trials or literature and no plausible mechanistic link. They are rated L5 and Hold, and are best regarded as network-proximity artefacts rather than real therapeutic signals.
Review Log
Below is the review log for this page: statements checked against official Indian medicine data (the Indian Medicine Dataset used by this site). Corrections are limited to basic factual statements; model predictions, evidence levels, and conclusions were not rewritten.
| Review date | Item | Action | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-31 | Removed: “Direct evidence for acute mania is thin: the only mania trial was withdrawn with no enrolment, and the supporting literature is mostly revie” | Corrected | Indian Medicine Dataset |
Disclaimer
This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.