Lacosamide

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Lacosamide
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Lacosamide: Manic bipolar affective disorder
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Lacosamide: Manic bipolar affective disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Lacosamide is a sodium-channel-modulating antiseizure medicine that is widely marketed in India. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for migraine disorder, with 4 clinical trials (including 3 Phase 3 trials) and 19 publications currently supporting this direction, including one published randomized double-blind trial against propranolol.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Manic bipolar affective disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9996
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products at least 20
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. From the literature, lacosamide enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and may also interact with collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2). Preclinical work suggests that CRMP2 modulation can reduce release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the trigeminal system, a key driver of migraine pain.

Several antiseizure medicines (such as topiramate) are already used for migraine prevention, so a link between seizure control and migraine prevention is established. In mice, lacosamide reduced cortical spreading depolarization, the wave of cortical activity thought to underlie migraine aura. This supports biological plausibility.

Clinical support is real but limited. Published human results come mainly from one randomized trial against propranolol, and most trials compare against active drugs rather than placebo. This limits conclusions about absolute efficacy.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT05851781 Phase 3 Completed 600 Lacosamide vs propranolol in migraine; outcomes are reduction in monthly headache days and ≥50% responder rate
NCT06243692 Phase 3 Unknown 600 Lacosamide vs topiramate in migraine; no results available, reliability uncertain
NCT05632133 Phase 3 (labelled; described as a pilot) Completed 200 Effect on serum CGRP in episodic migraine, with lacosamide 50 mg twice daily plus ibuprofen vs ibuprofen alone; biomarker-oriented
NCT00440518 Phase 2 Completed 218 Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 100 mg/day and 300 mg/day lacosamide; the registry title is truncated, so the indication could not be confirmed from the available data

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
41863672 2026 RCT Molecular Neurobiology Double-blind trial of lacosamide vs propranolol for episodic migraine prevention, aimed especially at patients who cannot tolerate propranolol
38502425 2024 RCT Acta Neurologica Belgica Effect of lacosamide on serum CGRP levels in episodic migraine patients
22779776 2013 Systematic review/meta-analysis Epilepsia Adverse event profile of lacosamide across randomized controlled trials
40670944 2025 Preclinical J Headache Pain Lacosamide effect on cortical spreading depolarization in mice
27917413 2016 Preclinical Pain Reports (S)-Lacosamide in preclinical models of cephalic pain, targeting CRMP2 to inhibit CGRP release
22862686 2012 Review Expert Opin Emerg Drugs Emerging treatments for chronic and refractory chronic migraine
38870050 2024 Review Expert Rev Neurother Pharmacotherapy update for trigeminal neuralgia; mentions third-generation anticonvulsants as possible options (indirect)

India Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
126251 Lacove 150mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated
250388 Zolaco 200mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated
121572 Lacoxa 100mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated
123738 Laconext 10mg Injection Vial of 20 ml injection Not stated
208370 Seizgard 150mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not stated

Twenty valid single-ingredient registrations are on record, in oral tablet and injectable forms.

Safety Considerations

  • Disease associations flagged in the knowledge graph (drug-disease contraindication links, not label text): liver disease, gallbladder disease, cardiac conduction and rhythm disorders (atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter), coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, and orthostatic hypotension and related autonomic disorders (multiple system atrophy, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome). Cardiac conduction problems deserve particular attention when screening migraine patients.
  • Drug Interactions: 25 interactions were recorded. Major-level interactions are with dolasetron, ceritinib and siponimod. Moderate-level interactions include clarithromycin, ethanol, cobicistat, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, mefloquine, lidocaine, ketoconazole, pasireotide, alectinib, brigatinib, crizotinib, fingolimod, idelalisib, imatinib, ozanimod and sunitinib. Many of these are drugs that affect cardiac conduction.
  • Case report safety signal: neutropenia was reported with lacosamide in a patient with bipolar disorder and epilepsy.

Package insert warnings and contraindications were not available in the data compiled for this report. Please refer to the package insert for full safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Migraine is the best-supported prediction among the candidates. It has three Phase 3 trials, one Phase 2 placebo-controlled trial and one published randomized double-blind trial, plus plausible sodium channel and CGRP-related mechanisms. However, published results come from essentially one trial and the active-comparator designs limit conclusions about absolute efficacy.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Results from the completed trials (NCT05851781, NCT00440518) and confirmation of what NCT00440518 studied
  • Independent replication, ideally a placebo-controlled trial, to confirm effect sizes
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the India registrations, plus the approved indication text
  • Confirmed mechanism of action data
  • A cardiac safety plan (ECG screening and attention to conduction-affecting co-medications)

Other predicted indications (for reference): Manic bipolar affective disorder (L3) and myofascial pain syndrome (L2) are research questions only. Bipolar disorder rests on small observational data and a neutropenia case report. Myofascial pain has only a Phase 2 trial in fibromyalgia, with no results provided. Tourette syndrome, trichotillomania, nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis, insomnia, migraine with brainstem aura, obsessive-compulsive disorder and papillary conjunctivitis are on hold, since they have no meaningful supporting evidence. For Tourette syndrome, the literature even suggests antiepileptic drugs can induce tics.

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.