Flutamide

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 8

Table of Contents

  1. Flutamide
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Flutamide: Fibroma of prostate
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Cytotoxicity
    10. Safety Considerations
    11. Conclusion and Next Steps
    12. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Flutamide: Fibroma of prostate

One-Sentence Summary

Flutamide is an oral androgen receptor antagonist originally used to treat prostate cancer.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Fibroma of prostate
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9998
Evidence Level L5 (top-ranked prediction); the best-supported category, male reproductive organ cancer, is graded L1 but mainly reflects the existing indication
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (7 of 7) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products 7 (valid: 7)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, flutamide is a nonsteroidal androgen receptor antagonist. Its efficacy in prostate cancer is established, and the literature describes it as a “pure antiandrogen” that blocks androgen action in the prostate.

The top-ranked prediction is not a convincing new indication. The prostate cancer component is simply the approved use. The brain cancer susceptibility component has no supporting mechanism, and the label looks like a genetic susceptibility entity rather than a disease that can be treated.

Several other predictions are also weak. Fibroma of prostate, prostate leiomyoma and benign prostate phyllodes tumor are very rare entities with no trials or literature. Brenner tumor, an ovarian neoplasm, has no known androgen-dependent mechanism.

The more interesting signals are in the benign and prevention settings:

  • Benign reproductive system neoplasm (rank 4): androgen blockade is plausible for androgen-sensitive benign tumors such as benign prostatic hyperplasia. A 1991 study examined flutamide’s effect on prostate volume, PSA and testosterone in such men.
  • Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia chemoprevention (within rank 6): a Phase 2 trial tested flutamide as a preventive agent.

Clinical Trial Evidence

No clinical trials are registered for the top-ranked prediction. Flutamide’s role in several of these trials is not confirmed.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00006214 Phase 2 Completed 63 Randomized chemoprevention trial of flutamide in men with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia; the most direct flutamide-specific trial and a possible new use (prevention)
NCT06601205 Phase 2/3 Completed 125 Pre-surgical window-of-opportunity trial of finasteride vs low-dose flutamide vs placebo in prostate cancer
NCT02918968 Phase 4 Completed 206 Enzalutamide vs flutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer after bicalutamide failure
NCT03507608 Early Phase 1 Completed 25 Single pulsed-dose flutamide to induce DNA double-strand breaks in prostate cancer with androgen suppression and brachytherapy; exploratory
NCT00003645 Phase 3 Terminated 64 Adjuvant leuprolide plus flutamide after prostate surgery in high-risk patients; underpowered
NCT00002597 Phase 3 Completed 2028 Radiation therapy with or without antiandrogen therapy (flutamide, goserelin, leuprolide) in locally confined prostate cancer
NCT00104741 Phase 3 Completed 378 Triptorelin plus flutamide with radiotherapy in intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer
NCT00003734 Phase 3 Unknown 276 4 vs 8 months of triptorelin plus flutamide before radiotherapy in high-risk localized prostate cancer
NCT00450463 Phase 2 Completed 64 PROSTVAC vaccine plus flutamide vs flutamide alone in androgen-insensitive non-metastatic prostate cancer
NCT00003323 Phase 2 Completed 101 Flutamide plus finasteride as potency-sparing hormonal therapy for rising PSA after radiation or prostatectomy

Literature Evidence

No publications are available for the top-ranked prediction. The table below shows the most relevant publications retrieved for the related categories (male reproductive organ cancer and benign reproductive system neoplasm). No randomized trial publications were retrieved.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
8252497 1993 Review (mechanism) Cancer Mechanism of action and pure antiandrogenic properties of flutamide; combining it with an LHRH agonist gives maximal prostate inhibition
3071951 1988 Review Am J Clin Oncol Rationale for combining a nonsteroidal antiandrogen with an LHRH agonist in prostate cancer
3285484 1988 Review/clinical Semin Oncol Advantages of total androgen blockade in advanced prostate cancer
1722793 1991 Clinical study J Androl Flutamide (750 mg/day) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: effects on prostate volume, PSA and testosterone
1989458 1991 Clinical/histological Am J Surg Pathol LHRH agonist plus flutamide pretreatment caused marked atrophy of benign prostate glands in 23 prostatectomies
24950779 2014 Preclinical and Phase 2 Cancer Prev Res Flutamide and tissue biomarkers in women at high risk for ovarian cancer
8146068 1994 Preclinical (rat) Prostate Early flutamide exposure delayed tumor appearance and reduced growth in a rat prostatic tumor model
20541672 2010 Review Prog Brain Res Hormonal therapy of prostate cancer and optimal androgen blockade
29958919 2018 Preclinical/Review Reprod Toxicol Effects of flutamide on cell-cell junctions in the testis, epididymis and prostate
7576816 1995 Review (toxicology) Hum Exp Toxicol Drug-induced Leydig cell hyperplasia and neoplasia in rats, including flutamide

India Market Information

Seven valid single-ingredient registrations exist. All are 250 mg oral tablets supplied as strips of 10. No approved indication text is recorded for any of them.

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
34456 Cytomid 250 Tablet (Cipla Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
225020 Ticum 250mg Tablet (Neon Laboratories Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
89698 Flutacare 250mg Tablet (Criticare Laboratories Pvt Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
87899 Flutide 250mg Tablet (Samarth Life Sciences Pvt Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
89008 Flutatec 250mg Tablet (United Biotech Pvt Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded

Cytotoxicity

Item Content
Cytotoxicity Classification Hormonal therapy (nonsteroidal antiandrogen), not a conventional cytotoxic agent
Myelosuppression Risk Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions
Emetogenicity Classification Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions
Monitoring Items Liver function (see Safety Considerations); please also refer to the package insert
Handling Protection Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions

Safety Considerations

  • Contraindications suggested by the knowledge graph (disease associations from the knowledge graph, not label text): liver failure, liver disease, gallbladder disease, methemoglobinemia, sulfhemoglobinemia, hyperbilirubinemia (including hereditary forms and Gilbert syndrome), G6PD deficiency, glycogen storage disease, cystinuria, galactosemia, pyruvate dehydrogenase E3 deficiency, and methemoglobinemia due to methemoglobin reductase deficiency.
  • Hepatotoxicity: the analysis of the HIV prediction notes a boxed warning for hepatotoxicity, and hepatotoxicity also limits use in benign conditions. This should be confirmed against the package insert.
  • Drug interactions: 285 interactions are recorded. Major interactions include dolasetron and cisapride. Moderate interactions include famotidine, loperamide, bisacodyl, clarithromycin, levofloxacin, ondansetron, palonosetron, naltrexone and obeticholic acid, as well as several laxatives and bowel-preparation agents (picosulfuric acid, polyethylene glycol, sodium sulfate, lactitol, lactulose, castor oil, glycerin). Metronidazole is a minor interaction.

Please refer to the package insert for the full warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The trial-rich category of male reproductive organ cancer mostly represents flutamide’s existing prostate cancer use, not a new one. The nearest genuine repurposing signals are prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia chemoprevention (NCT00006214) and androgen-sensitive benign prostate conditions, both based on small, older studies. Flutamide’s hepatotoxicity and the many drug interactions add further caution.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications (a blocking data gap for safety screening), including hepatotoxicity monitoring requirements
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Verification of flutamide’s specific role and results in the Phase 3 hormonal therapy trials, and the published outcomes of the Phase 2 chemoprevention trial NCT00006214
  • A clearly defined, treatable target indication (for example prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or benign prostatic conditions) with a comparison against established alternatives such as 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and alpha-blockers

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.