Famotidine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 4

Table of Contents

  1. Famotidine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Famotidine: Duodenal obstruction
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Famotidine: Duodenal obstruction

One-Sentence Summary

Famotidine is an H2 receptor antagonist originally used to treat gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Stronger support exists for related ulcer indications such as peptic ulcer disease (8 clinical trials, 20 publications), but this largely overlaps famotidine’s approved uses and is not true repurposing.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Duodenal obstruction
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9999
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products at least 20
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism-of-action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, famotidine is a selective histamine H2 receptor antagonist. It reduces basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion, which is the basis for its use in ulcer healing and reflux disease.

Duodenogastric reflux is driven mainly by bile and duodenal contents flowing back into the stomach. Acid suppression may lessen mucosal injury from refluxed material, but it does not address the cause, so any benefit would be indirect. The two available publications are a cohort study of famotidine’s effect on gastroesophageal and duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux in critically ill patients (2003) and a Russian-language report of famotidine 20 mg twice daily in early gastroduodenal reflux disease (2004). Both are small or old.

The other predictions fall into three groups:

  • Overlap with approved uses: Peptic ulcer disease (L1, 8 trials) and active peptic ulcer disease (L1, includes randomized placebo-controlled and comparative trials) are on-label acid-related conditions.
  • Plausible but weakly supported: Gastrojejunal ulcer, gastroduodenitis, and peptic ulcer perforation (all L3) rest on acid-dependence, but PPIs appear to be the preferred standard.
  • Unsupported: Duodenal obstruction, abnormality of glucagon secretion, and acne have no plausible direct mechanism or no data. Multiple endocrine neoplasia has only one indirect 1986 review.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered for duodenogastric reflux.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01180179 Phase 4 Completed 228 Lansoprazole vs famotidine for preventing recurrent idiopathic gastroduodenal ulcer bleeding
NCT00843063 Phase 4 Completed 161 High-dose famotidine vs pantoprazole for preventing recurrent aspirin-induced ulcer/erosion; famotidine was inferior
NCT02418312 N/A Completed 228 H2 receptor antagonist for preventing thienopyridine-related peptic ulcer
NCT02551744 N/A Completed 101 Pantoprazole vs famotidine for preventing recurrent ulcers in thienopyridine users
NCT00229424 Phase 3 Completed 325 Lafutidine vs placebo and famotidine in mild reflux oesophagitis
NCT03667703 Phase 4 Completed 70 Stress ulcer prophylaxis vs placebo in critically ill infants with congenital heart disease
NCT00557349 Phase 4 Completed 40 Zegerid vs famotidine for preventing anastomotic ulcers after gastric bypass
NCT00839488 Phase 4 Terminated 6 IV pantoprazole vs famotidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery; underpowered

Literature Evidence

Publications directly related to duodenogastric reflux:

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
12532466 2003 Cohort/Clinical study World J Gastroenterol Effect of famotidine on gastroesophageal and duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux in critically ill patients
16259441 2004 Clinical study (non-English) Eksp Klin Gastroenterol Famotidine 20 mg twice daily in early-stage gastroduodenal reflux disease

Selected supporting literature from the related peptic ulcer predictions:

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
2877912 1987 RCT Gastroenterology Placebo-controlled; nocturnal vs twice-daily famotidine in active duodenal ulcer (n=384)
2570005 1989 RCT Digestion Famotidine vs cimetidine in active duodenal ulcer (n=119)
2877570 1986 Multicenter randomized study Am J Med Famotidine vs ranitidine in active duodenal ulcer (n=1,031)
19837071 2010 RCT Gastroenterology Famotidine inferior to pantoprazole in preventing recurrence of aspirin-related ulcers or erosions
31229990 2020 RCT Gut Lansoprazole vs famotidine for preventing recurrent idiopathic ulcer bleeding
22186979 2012 RCT Am J Gastroenterol Ibuprofen/high-dose famotidine single tablet reduced gastric and duodenal ulcers vs ibuprofen alone
41405382 2026 Systematic review/Meta-analysis Crit Care Med H2RAs vs PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis in septic shock
2573505 1989 Review Drugs Updated review of famotidine pharmacology and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease

India Market Information

Famotidine has 20 valid single-ingredient registrations, all oral tablets. The records contain no approved-indication text. Five examples:

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
94049 Famomeg 40mg Tablet (Ridhima Biocare) Strip of 14 tablets Not stated in records
84383 Famogreat 40mg Tablet (Mankind Pharma Ltd) Strip of 14 tablets Not stated in records
86066 Fadine 20mg Tablet (Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd) Strip of 14 tablets Not stated in records
127423 Litz 40mg Tablet (Glitz Pharma) Strip of 10 tablets Not stated in records
90455 Famopril 20mg Tablet (Zydus Cadila) Strip of 10 tablets Not stated in records

Safety Considerations

  • These need verification against the package insert.
  • Drug Interactions: 639 interactions were found. Most listed are Moderate, for example abiraterone, acalabrutinib, tramadol, amiodarone, amitriptyline, aripiprazole, and aminophylline. Alendronic acid and aluminum hydroxide are Minor.
  • Literature-noted cautions: Renal dose adjustment is needed, and CNS adverse effects such as delirium have been reported (case report, 11573854), especially in the elderly.

Please also refer to the package insert for full warnings and contraindications.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Famotidine acts on acid, whereas this condition is bile-driven, so benefit would be indirect. The L1 evidence applies to peptic ulcer disease, which overlaps famotidine’s approved uses and is not true repurposing. In that setting famotidine was inferior to PPIs for preventing aspirin-related ulcer recurrence.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • A prospective, controlled study of famotidine in duodenogastric reflux, with bile-reflux endpoints
  • Detailed mechanism-of-action data
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the India regulator
  • A comparison against PPIs, and a dosing plan covering renal impairment and elderly patients

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.