Dienogest

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Dienogest
  2. Dienogest: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. India Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Dienogest: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea

One-Sentence Summary

Dienogest (Visanne®) is a fourth-generation progestin approved and widely used internationally for the treatment of endometriosis, where it suppresses endometrial tissue growth through hypoestrogenic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. The TxGNN model predicts it may be applicable to Amenorrhea, with 4 clinical trials and 6 publications currently available — though the majority relate to endometriosis contexts where amenorrhea emerges as a pharmacological effect rather than a primary treatment target. This distinction critically limits the repurposing value, and the overall evidence requires careful interpretation before any clinical development decision can be made.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Endometriosis (based on clinical trial and literature context; no approved indication listed in India regulatory data)
Predicted New Indication Amenorrhea
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.71%
Evidence Level L3
India Market Status ✗ Not marketed
Number of Registrations 0
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Dienogest is a fourth-generation progestin with high selectivity for progesterone receptors and minimal androgenic activity. Its primary mechanism in endometriosis involves suppressing ovarian estradiol production (creating a hypoestrogenic environment), inhibiting endometrial cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis of ectopic endometrial tissue, and reducing local inflammation via downregulation of inflammatory cytokines. It does not bind significantly to androgen, glucocorticoid, or mineralocorticoid receptors, giving it a relatively clean pharmacological profile.

The mechanistic connection between dienogest and amenorrhea is real but directionally reversed from a classic repurposing scenario: dienogest does not treat amenorrhea — it induces it as a pharmacological effect. In 60–80% of women treated with dienogest for endometriosis, menstruation is suppressed (drug-induced amenorrhea). This effect is intentional and considered therapeutically desirable in endometriosis management, as it reduces retrograde menstruation and lesion stimulation.

Where limited biological plausibility exists for repurposing is in secondary amenorrhea — specifically cases arising from PCOS or endometriosis-related hormonal dysregulation, where cyclic progestin therapy can help reset uterine bleeding patterns. However, this is a very different clinical scenario from primary amenorrhea, which has distinct anatomical or genetic etiologies that progestins cannot address. The TxGNN model’s high score likely reflects topological proximity in the knowledge graph between “progestins” and “amenorrhea” nodes, rather than a direct therapeutic relationship.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT07164183 Phase 3 Recruiting 290 Non-inferiority RCT comparing Indinol Forto® 200 mg vs. Visanne® (dienogest 2 mg) in endometriosis; menstrual suppression likely a secondary endpoint
NCT07204093 N/A Active, not recruiting 138 Compares transdermal estradiol + dienogest vs. estradiol + drospirenone in endometriosis; evaluates patient satisfaction with estradiol add-back regimens
NCT04495855 N/A Completed 968 Real-world observational study of Visanne® in endometriosis; amenorrhea captured as a safety/efficacy outcome, not the primary endpoint
NCT02425462 N/A Completed 895 Prospective observational cohort in Asian women with endometriosis; focuses on quality of life and long-term safety; menstrual suppression is a secondary observation

Note: None of the identified trials study amenorrhea as a primary treatment target. Amenorrhea appears as a pharmacological effect or safety observation within endometriosis trials.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
39090694 2024 Systematic Review + Bayesian Analysis BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with dienogest; amenorrhea identified as a frequent, mechanism-driven effect during treatment of endometriosis and adenomyosis
41329046 2026 Clinical Pharmacology Study European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care Confirms dienogest’s high inhibition ratio and transformation index; its pharmacological properties deliberately induce amenorrhea as part of endometriosis management
34405378 2022 Narrative Review Reviews in Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders Reviews hormonal treatment landscape for endometriosis; estrogen-dependency and progesterone-resistance are key pathogenic drivers; progestins including dienogest are first-line options
29161960 2018 Prospective Clinical Study Reproductive Sciences Retrospective cohort (n=514) assessing long-term efficacy and safety of dienogest beyond 12 months in ovarian endometrioma; amenorrhea rates documented as a treatment effect
40543564 2025 Clinical Report Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Case series on obstructive Müllerian anomalies using 3D/VR imaging; dienogest used for medical management during diagnostic workup; marginal relevance to amenorrhea repurposing
34918698 2021 Case Report Medicine Case of ovarian granulosa cell tumor in PCOS context; PCOS-related secondary amenorrhea provides indirect contextual link; low direct evidence value

India Market Information

Dienogest is currently not approved or marketed in India. No drug licenses, registrations, or approved indications are on record in the CDSCO database for this compound.

This represents a significant regulatory gap. Any repurposing effort would require a de novo regulatory submission in India, including clinical data from the target indication.


Safety Considerations

Drug Interactions (37 interactions identified via DDInter):

Major interactions (exercise caution; consider alternatives):

Interacting Drug Level Clinical Concern
Sugammadex Major Possible reduced effectiveness of hormonal agents (steroidal reversal competition)
Griseofulvin Major CYP induction may accelerate dienogest metabolism, reducing efficacy
Bexarotene Major Hormonal contraceptive/progestin efficacy may be compromised
Brigatinib Major CYP3A4 induction risk; progestin exposure may be reduced
Dabrafenib Major CYP3A4 induction; may decrease dienogest plasma levels
Encorafenib Major CYP-mediated interaction; hormonal drug efficacy may be affected

Selected moderate interactions:

Interacting Drug Level
Adalimumab Moderate
Anakinra Moderate
Canakinumab Moderate
Certolizumab pegol Moderate
Cladribine Moderate
Linaclotide Moderate
Miltefosine Moderate
Metreleptin Moderate

Minor interactions:

  • Ethanol (minor; monitoring advised)

Please refer to the full package insert for complete safety information, including pregnancy contraindication (Category X), venous thromboembolism risk, and hepatic function requirements.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The TxGNN model’s prediction that dienogest could be used for amenorrhea reflects a pharmacological reality — dienogest reliably induces amenorrhea — but this is a drug-induced effect, not a treatment of the underlying condition. For primary amenorrhea (structural/genetic causes), dienogest has no mechanistic basis. For secondary amenorrhea from PCOS or endometriosis, progestin therapy has some clinical logic, but dienogest’s strong ovarian-suppressive profile may be inappropriate. Additionally, dienogest is not marketed in India (0 registrations), and key safety data (package insert warnings, contraindications) are unavailable for this evaluation.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Clarify the amenorrhea subtype: Distinguish primary vs. secondary amenorrhea; the latter (PCOS-related or endometriosis-related) carries more biological plausibility for progestin intervention
  • Retrieve the full package insert from the EMA/MHRA (Visanne® is approved in Europe) to complete the mandatory safety assessment, including warnings, contraindications, and pregnancy category
  • Confirm MOA data from DrugBank (DB09123) to strengthen the mechanistic analysis
  • Conduct a dedicated literature search specifically for “progestin” + “secondary amenorrhea” + “PCOS” to identify any direct evidence base, separate from the endometriosis literature retrieved here
  • Assess regulatory pathway in India: Since the drug has no CDSCO registration, a regulatory strategy review is essential before any clinical program can be designed
  • Evaluate benefit-risk for the secondary amenorrhea niche: If the target population is defined as PCOS-related or endometriosis-related secondary amenorrhea, a small proof-of-concept study with amenorrhea restoration (not induction) as the primary endpoint would be the minimum needed to move this to L2 evidence

This report is generated for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. All drug repurposing candidates require clinical validation before application.

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 InTxGNN Project. For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.