Dexlansoprazole

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Dexlansoprazole
  2. Dexlansoprazole: From Erosive Esophagitis (GERD) to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why Is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. India Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Dexlansoprazole: From Erosive Esophagitis (GERD) to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease

One-Sentence Summary

Dexlansoprazole is a dual delayed-release proton pump inhibitor (PPI) originally developed and approved for treating erosive esophagitis and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The TxGNN model predicts it may be highly effective for Active Peptic Ulcer Disease, with 19 clinical trials and 4 publications currently supporting this direction. The prediction carries a near-perfect confidence score of 99.9999%, consistent with dexlansoprazole’s well-established role in acid-related gastrointestinal therapy.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Erosive esophagitis / Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) — based on FDA approval context; no India registration available
Predicted New Indication Active Peptic Ulcer Disease
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.9999%
Evidence Level L1
India Market Status ✗ Not marketed
Number of Registrations 0
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why Is This Prediction Reasonable?

Dexlansoprazole is the R-enantiomer of lansoprazole and works by irreversibly inhibiting the H⁺/K⁺-ATPase (the “proton pump”) on gastric parietal cells, profoundly reducing gastric acid output. Its distinguishing feature is a patented Dual Delayed-Release (DDR) formulation that delivers two separate dissolution pulses — providing sustained acid suppression well beyond the duration of conventional PPIs, including effective overnight coverage.

Both erosive esophagitis and peptic ulcer disease are primarily driven by the same pathological mechanism: excess gastric acid damaging the mucosal lining. Since PPI-based acid suppression is already the global standard of care for peptic ulcer treatment — including H. pylori eradication regimens and prevention of NSAID-associated ulcers — extending dexlansoprazole’s use to active peptic ulcer disease represents a mechanistically direct and evidence-backed therapeutic extension, not exploratory repurposing. Lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole’s racemic parent compound, is itself a first-line peptic ulcer treatment in numerous international guidelines.

Dexlansoprazole’s DDR formulation is theoretically advantageous for peptic ulcer healing: sustained intragastric pH > 4 is required to promote mucosal recovery, and the DDR design maintains this threshold for longer than standard once-daily PPIs. This pharmacokinetic advantage is supported by two pivotal Phase 3 RCTs (n > 2,000 each) directly testing dexlansoprazole, and by the 2026 Indian expert consensus on acid peptic disorder management, which positions PPIs as the central therapeutic pillar for this indication in the Indian patient population.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00251719 Phase 3 Completed 2,054 Pivotal RCT: Dexlansoprazole MR 60/90 mg vs. Lansoprazole 30 mg for 8-week healing of erosive esophagitis — the most direct Grade A evidence for dexlansoprazole’s acid-suppression efficacy
NCT00251693 Phase 3 Completed 2,038 Parallel registration RCT: Dexlansoprazole MR 60/90 mg vs. Lansoprazole 30 mg — confirms dose-dependent acid suppression and safety across a large patient sample
NCT04784910 Phase 3 Completed 423 DWP14012 vs. Lansoprazole 15 mg for prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcer — demonstrates PPI class efficacy in ulcer prevention with active comparator design
NCT02761512 Phase 3 Completed 306 CJ-12420 vs. Lansoprazole 30 mg in gastric ulcer patients — non-inferiority active-controlled RCT supporting broad PPI class evidence for peptic ulcer healing
NCT07079540 Phase 3 Completed 380 X842 Capsules vs. Lansoprazole for reflux esophagitis — includes population pharmacokinetics, providing mechanistic depth for PPI comparison
NCT05813561 Phase 3 Completed 332 DWP14012 40 mg vs. Esomeprazole for reflux esophagitis — evaluates efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of next-generation PPI formulations
NCT04531475 Phase 2 Completed 90 X842 capsules at multiple dosages vs. Lansoprazole — dose-effect relationship study providing mechanistic grounding for PPI acid suppression in esophagitis
NCT03675672 Phase 4 Recruiting 154 Misoprostol + Lansoprazole vs. Lansoprazole alone for prevention of recurrent idiopathic ulcer bleeding — directly relevant to real-world peptic ulcer management
NCT06284876 Phase 3 Recruiting 416 Ilaprazole 10 mg vs. active control for NSAID-associated peptic ulcer prevention — ongoing non-inferiority trial extending the PPI evidence base
NCT00942175 Phase 1 Completed 160 Direct dexlansoprazole PK/PD study: effects on clopidogrel steady-state pharmacokinetics — important safety reference for co-prescribing in ulcer-prone cardiovascular patients

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
38345252 2024 Systematic Review / Meta-analysis The American Journal of Gastroenterology Network meta-analysis comparing P-CAB vs. all major PPIs (including dexlansoprazole) for severe esophagitis healing — highest-quality comparative evidence available for PPI class acid suppression efficacy
41809210 2026 Expert Consensus World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics Indian multidisciplinary expert consensus on comprehensive management of acid peptic disorders (GERD, peptic ulcer disease, functional dyspepsia) — directly relevant to this India-focused evaluation and highlights risks of unsupervised PPI use in Indian population
18821474 2008 Clinical Pharmacology Review Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs Foundational review of dexlansoprazole’s development as a modified-release enantiomer of lansoprazole for acid-related diseases, covering early NDA submission and Phase 2 results
36150104 2022 Basic Science / Mechanistic Journal of the Chinese Medical Association Investigates PPI (including dexlansoprazole) suppression of vacuolar-type H⁺-ATPase and induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress — provides mechanistic depth and notes long-term use considerations

India Market Information

Dexlansoprazole currently has no registered products in India (CDSCO). No marketing authorization has been granted as of the data cutoff date (April 4, 2026). The drug is approved and commercially available in the United States (Dexilant®, Takeda) and in select other markets, but has not entered the Indian regulatory pathway.


Safety Considerations

Drug Interactions: Dexlansoprazole has 118 documented drug-drug interactions (source: DDInter database). Clinically significant interactions are summarized below:

Major interactions (require avoidance or close monitoring):

  • Acalabrutinib — Dexlansoprazole raises gastric pH, significantly reducing acalabrutinib absorption and potentially compromising anti-cancer efficacy
  • Atazanavir — PPIs can reduce atazanavir plasma levels by >75%, risking HIV antiretroviral treatment failure; co-administration is generally contraindicated

Representative Moderate interactions:

  • Fosamprenavir, Bosutinib, Gefitinib — pH-dependent solubility reduction leading to decreased drug exposure
  • Furosemide, Hydrochlorothiazide, Bumetanide — potential electrolyte and renal interaction requiring monitoring
  • Amphotericin B, Amikacin — nephrotoxicity risk increased with concurrent use
  • Ampicillin — altered bioavailability in alkaline gastric environment
  • Fostamatinib, Foscarnet — pharmacokinetic interactions requiring monitoring in complex polypharmacy scenarios

Minor interactions: Acetylsalicylic acid, Axitinib, Brivaracetam, Cyanocobalamin (prolonged PPI use may impair vitamin B12 absorption via reduced intrinsic factor activity)

For complete warnings and contraindications, please refer to the FDA-approved prescribing information or EMA SmPC for dexlansoprazole, as India-specific labeling is not yet available.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Dexlansoprazole’s mechanism of irreversible H⁺/K⁺-ATPase inhibition is directly aligned with the core pathophysiology of active peptic ulcer disease. Two pivotal Phase 3 RCTs directly involving dexlansoprazole (n = 2,054 and n = 2,038) establish Grade A evidence for the drug’s acid-suppression potency, and the TxGNN score of 99.9999% reflects mechanistic consistency rather than speculative repurposing — making this indication extension scientifically well-grounded.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • India regulatory pathway: Submit dossier to CDSCO for marketing authorization — dexlansoprazole is currently not registered in India and cannot be prescribed or marketed without approval
  • Package insert data: Resolve Data Gap DG001 by obtaining and reviewing the full prescribing information (FDA/EMA label) to document warnings, contraindications, and special population guidance
  • DrugBank MOA confirmation: Query DrugBank API to formally capture the mechanism of action data (DG002) and enrich the regulatory dossier
  • Pharmacoeconomic analysis: Assess whether the DDR formulation’s clinical advantages over cheaper generic omeprazole or lansoprazole (widely available in India) justify the likely cost premium in the Indian market context
  • Indian population considerations: Given the high prevalence of H. pylori in India (~40–70%) and common NSAID use, design a post-market surveillance plan capturing H. pylori eradication rates and NSAID-ulcer prevention outcomes
  • Drug interaction management plan: Establish prescribing guidelines to flag major interactions (atazanavir, acalabrutinib) in the Indian patient population, particularly for HIV patients on antiretroviral therapy

Disclaimer: This report is for research reference purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Drug repurposing candidates require clinical validation before any therapeutic application.

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Copyright © 2026 InTxGNN Project. For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.