Cimetidine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 4

Table of Contents

  1. Cimetidine
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Cimetidine: Histamine H2-receptor antagonist → peptic ulcer perforation
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Cimetidine: Histamine H2-receptor antagonist → peptic ulcer perforation

One-Sentence Summary

Cimetidine is a histamine H2-receptor antagonist that reduces stomach acid. The TxGNN model predicts it may be relevant for peptic ulcer perforation, but no clinical trials are registered and the 20 publications compiled for this report are mostly case reports, reviews and observational analyses. Several of them describe perforation occurring while patients were taking cimetidine.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication peptic ulcer perforation
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9977
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (8 of 8) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products 8 (valid: 8)
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Cimetidine belongs to the H2-receptor antagonist class, which lowers gastric acid secretion. In principle, acid suppression could support healing of the ulcer that underlies a perforation.

However, perforation is an acute surgical emergency, and acid suppression is not a treatment for it. Several reports in the literature describe perforation occurring while patients were already on cimetidine (PMIDs 3967139, 6743974, 7082957). This argues against efficacy in preventing or treating this complication. The high model score most likely reflects the general association between cimetidine and peptic ulcer disease rather than a true therapeutic signal.

No cited study tests cimetidine as a treatment for peptic ulcer perforation. The evidence level is therefore L5.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
8364140 1993 Review of controlled trials Aliment Pharmacol Ther Continuous H2-antagonist therapy reduces ulcer recurrence; relapse rates vary with study design
6113521 1981 Review Lancet Overview of cimetidine and peptic ulcer
3967139 1985 Case report Br J Surg Perforation occurring while on cimetidine
6743974 1984 Case report Br J Surg Nine duodenal ulcer perforations on cimetidine; all eventually needed truncal vagotomy and drainage
7082957 1982 Hospital review/letter Br J Surg After cimetidine became available, elective ulcer operations fell 45%, perforations only about 10%
6649737 1983 Observational analysis Z Gastroenterol Operations for ulcer fell 35% after cimetidine; fewer elective cases, with a smaller decrease in complicated ulcers
6861858 1983 Observational analysis Eur J Clin Pharmacol Peptic-ulcer-related discharges were about 10% lower once cimetidine was widely available
1975090 1990 Review Minerva Chir Ulcer therapy before and after cimetidine; surgical outcomes
6150640 1984 Review Am J Med Hospitalizations for duodenal ulcer fell, but perforation incidence did not change significantly
922364 1977 Report Br Med J Perforation of peptic ulcer after withdrawal of cimetidine

India Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
231297 Ulciban 400mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
223407 Tagasec 200mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
43394 Cimetiget 200mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
155392 Neotid 400mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
39684 Cimetiget 400mg Tablet Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded

Safety Considerations

  • Disease-related cautions (not label text): The data compiled for this report flag liver disease, gallbladder disease, impaired renal function and gastric cancers (including gastric carcinoma and gastric neoplasm) as conditions of concern.
  • Drug Interactions: 551 interactions are recorded. Examples at moderate level include paclitaxel, fentanyl, acalabrutinib, lidocaine, acebutolol, dihydrocodeine, codeine, tramadol, nifedipine and alfentanil. Minor-level examples include dolutegravir, zidovudine, acetaminophen, ibuprofen and ethanol.

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: No clinical trial or study directly supports cimetidine for peptic ulcer perforation. Case reports show perforation occurring during cimetidine therapy, so the prediction looks like an artifact of the drug’s link to ulcer disease.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Direct clinical evidence in perforated ulcer, such as controlled studies of post-operative or conservative management
  • Mechanism of action data
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the Indian regulatory source
  • A review of the interaction profile for likely co-medications

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.