Apixaban

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 1

Table of Contents

  1. Apixaban
    1. Pharmacist Assessment Report
    2. Apixaban: Migraine disorder
    3. One-Sentence Summary
    4. Quick Overview
    5. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    6. Clinical Trial Evidence
    7. Literature Evidence
    8. India Market Information
    9. Safety Considerations
    10. Conclusion and Next Steps
    11. Disclaimer

Pharmacist Assessment Report

Apixaban: Migraine disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Apixaban is an oral anticoagulant that inhibits factor Xa. The TxGNN model predicts it may be relevant to migraine disorder, but the evidence level is L5: no study supports apixaban for migraine. The one listed clinical trial addresses stroke recurrence after patent foramen ovale, not migraine, and the case reports describe migraine with aura that worsened or did not resolve on apixaban.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not recorded in the local data
Predicted New Indication Migraine disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 0.9902
Evidence Level L5
India Market Status Listed in a compiled Indian medicine price dataset (at least 20) – CDSCO approval status is not included in this data
Number of Listed Products at least 20
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Apixaban is known as a direct factor Xa inhibitor used as an anticoagulant.

The proposed link is thromboembolic. Migraine with aura has been associated with paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale and with antiphospholipid antibodies, so anticoagulation could plausibly affect migraine in selected patients.

However, the available case reports describe migraine with aura worsening after starting apixaban, and no benefit compared with warfarin. This argues against a consistent therapeutic effect. The high model score is not supported by clinical data.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00562289 Phase 3 Completed 664 PFO closure vs anticoagulants vs antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence. Migraine is not the primary endpoint, the population is cryptogenic stroke patients, and apixaban is not clearly the studied anticoagulant. Only indirectly related.

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
33402037 2021 Retrospective study (75 patients) Lupus Response to antithrombotic therapy in refractory migraine with antiphospholipid antibodies. The drugs studied and the design should be verified.
37582651 2023 Case report and review The Neurologist Migraine with aura worsened after starting apixaban. The authors note that literature on direct oral anticoagulants in migraine is scarce and controversial.
28960288 2017 Case report Headache Migraine with aura remained in remission on warfarin for 12 years, returned within 3 weeks of switching to apixaban, and resolved again on resuming warfarin.

India Market Information

At least 20 valid single-ingredient licences are recorded, and the list may be partial. Main examples:

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
72922 Eliquis 2.5mg Tablet (Pfizer Ltd) Strip of 14 tablets Not recorded
72362 Eliquis 5mg Tablet (Pfizer Ltd) Box of 20 tablets Not recorded
174055 Pixaflo 2.5mg Tablet (Lupin Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
174532 Paxiba 5 Tablet (Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd) Strip of 10 tablets Not recorded
243850 Xapilis 5 Tablet (Abbott) Strip of 14 tablets Not recorded

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions are recorded. Major-level examples include acetylsalicylic acid, cobicistat, deferasirox, ibritumomab tiuxetan and tositumomab. Moderate-level examples include aprepitant, clarithromycin, dexamethasone, miconazole and rolapitant.
  • Case reports suggest apixaban may worsen migraine with aura in some patients.

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The evidence level is L5. No study supports apixaban for migraine, and the available case reports point to worsening or no benefit. The high model score is not backed by clinical data.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Controlled studies that directly assess apixaban in migraine, ideally in subgroups with PFO or antiphospholipid antibodies
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Package insert warnings and contraindications
  • Review of the reported worsening of migraine with aura on apixaban

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.